Letter to Edward Hugh
Sir, Yours “Estonia’s Long Awaited Recovery May Still Be Delayed Yet Awhile” is correct, but in a case of small and low ecomomic activity level emerging economy, like Estonia, the good GDP growth rate by quarters is no credible recovery indicator, so also decrease of unemployed: as low level produces easily high growth rates, and smallness enabels easy exit of specialists + naturally high level of foreign trade is connected wih high volatility, especially in case of the big unpredictable neighbour as ours etc.
More important are indicators more closely connected with the level of sustainability/capacity/potential/institutional evolution/stability.
What I certainly missed, in your although excellent analysis, in the present Estonian context were indicators as: outflow of capital (btw in case of Estonia, without domestic taxing), domestic investments rate, gross external debt, economic inequality and social capital, savings rate, reforms and economic system quality evolution (especially tax system), public economics knowledge structure quality evolution, rate of net national income in GDP, dynamics of housholds incomes etc.
With respect, Ülo Ennuste, ylo.ennuste@mail.ee
No comments yet.
-
Recent
-
Links
-
Archives
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (1)
- March 2022 (1)
- January 2021 (2)
- December 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (5)
- October 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (1)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Leave a comment